Re: [LAU] Pro Audio? OT rant.

On 12/29/2012 02:54 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote: Possibly true, but consider the fact that a floor wedge is the loudest source reproducing the mic signal. The monitor (or monitors) will typically be at 110-120dBa, and aimed directly at the back of the microphone. You can easily use the polar response of the microphone to reduce feedback. For example, an SM58 has the best rejection at about 160 degrees off axis. A hyper-cardiod, such as a Beyer M88 has the best rejection about somewhere around 120 degrees off axis. An omni-directional mic is unusable is any situation where that mic is being fed into a monitor system, unless the source is at least 20dB louder than the monitor signal, which MAY be the case if you're micing a guitar cabinet, since a) the cabinet would be close-miced, and b) there probably isn't a monitor aimed directly at the front of the guitar cabinet. It would NOT be suitable at all for vocals, or when you're micing horns, acoustic guitar, violin, etc. It would also be complicated if you are using side-fills, as is typical. Of course, it's also complicated by stupid things such as whether or not the lead singer decides to put on a hat! I mixed monitors for many many years. It's far more complicated than it would appear at a casual glance. You get 8-10 on-stage monitor mixes, running a total of about 100,000 watts (including sidefills), and there's a lot going on. -- --- My bands, CD projects, music, news, and pictures: http://www.lateralforce.com My blog, with commentary on a variety of things, including audio, mixing, equipment, etc, is at: http://audioandmore.wordpress.com Staat heißt das kälteste aller kalten Ungeheuer. Kalt lügt es auch; und diese Lüge kriecht aus seinem Munde: 'Ich, der Staat, bin das Volk.' - [Friedrich Nietzsche]