7 Aug
2009
7 Aug
'09
7:43 a.m.
Paul Neaveill wrote:
<blockquote>Message: 19
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:36:02 -1000
From: david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
<http://us.mc332.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gnome@hawaii.rr.com>>
Subject: Re: [LAU] resubmitting questions from last week
To: linuxaudio <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
<http://us.mc332.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org>>
Message-ID: <4A793662.2030501(a)hawaii.rr.com
<http://us.mc332.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=4A793662.2030501@hawaii.rr.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Perhaps you're so far out on the leading edge of audio kernel
configuration that you're pursuing things nobody else is doing yet?
Document well what you do, you may be blazing the trail!
Paul
</blockquote>
Appreciate the compliment, but assure you that am not intending anything
even close to that at all. Rather, am simply and humbly asking where to
plug in the values mentioned last week or so by several people about the
migration, posixcputmr and the other things.
Continued thanks in advance and process of this
Well, good luck. I don't even have an RT kernel running on my
synthesizer/effects laptop setup - the attempt to add an RT kernel to an
Ubuntu setup successfully hosed the Ubuntu setup beyond my willingness
to try to repair.
I do need to add one, though! Or maybe do some selective optimization
(like removing wireless support, I don't use wireless, anyway). Xruns
and crackling, plus messages that it has run out of CPU. I'd like to use
JACKRack's plugins, but using more than one at time to process
fluidsynth-generated sounds seems to be more than what the laptop's
2.8GHz Celeron is capable of handling without an RT kernel.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community