19 Mar
2005
19 Mar
'05
3:18 p.m.
Rob wrote:
We have a different definition of "Free" I downloaded both Linux and
Winblows versions of this client app. Didnt pay anything for them. Can
call other PC's with Skype for nothing all day long.
Trust me...this ~IS~ virtually impossible. My companies current business
model depends on it. Far too many Big Billion dollar investements been
made in VOIP starting late 2003 to current day by all the big players.
Collaborating with Skype was what started this thread.
To each their own. I guess my point is sometimes we get so very far from
the *audio on linux* topic base.
Cheers,
R~
On Saturday 19 March 2005 00:49, Russell Hanaghan
wrote:
I subsequently stand corrected.
Point of fact, as I have been told from a senior
VP, it is in fact
written by the guys who started Napster. Skype uses our backbone
for its bandwidth.
He was incorrect. "Skype was created by Niklas Zennström and Janus
Friis, founders of KaZaA", says Skype themselves.
http://www.skype.com/company/founders.html
Not sure where all the "land mines"
are... It's free!
It's not free software. SIP clients like linphone and PhoneGaim are.
All they
want to charge for is calls terminating on the PSTN.
All they want to do is own the VOIP market. It seems disingenuous to
pretend otherwise.
No, it's
not
open source....but as I recall, that didn t matter when it was
being tested for Jamming / collaborating across the net? Many
still use windows don't they??
I don't use Windows, and I haven't heard anything about jamming over
the net with or without free software. Playing live isn't something
I'm interested in or would pay attention to, though I hope to come up
with a nice web-based collaboration tool eventually.
And when its all said and done...do we really care
*that* much
here? If the app doesnt do what u want it to do....don't use it.
If it does and they want bux...oh well. You have a choice.
Sure I do. I have another choice, too: whether or not to encourage
the use of free software over shady, secretive proprietary software.
I'm exercising that choice here. If enough people use proprietary
software, eventually (as was the case in the desktop OS market until
recently) there will effectively be no choice. Surely even "u" can
see that.
Rob