1 Dec
2003
1 Dec
'03
7:14 a.m.
On Monday 01 Dec 2003 11:08 am, Chris Cannam wrote:
So you see, I've generally assumed that most of
these fonts were
just designed to have the string ensemble 1 sound a bit more
vigorous for faster passages and the string ensemble 2 be the
friendly wash. That is actually quite a useful distinction.
Aha, and I see they are actually coded as Strings and Slow Strings.
My mistake.
Looking at the font in Swami, the strings (ensemble strings 1 as I was
referring to it before) have distinctly shorter hold and release than
the slow strings... obviously. Hmm.
Chris