8 Jun
2014
8 Jun
'14
11:49 a.m.
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 06:38:50AM +0200, hermann meyer wrote:
You're missing the point. Which is that the frequency info
*should* be used to decide how to map bins to a new frequency.
Also, it's easy to reduce CPU load by letting the whole thing
run at a quarter of the system sample rate. Which means that
for one octave down everything above 3 kHz is gone. But I guess
CPU load was not the only reason for doing that.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
>>The
whole part that finds the exact frequency by comparing
>>phases is completely redundant. This information is never
>>really used. It just looks as if it is used.
That's true, we could leave that part out, that will spare us 0.2%
dsp load.