Resending as the first one appears to have been blocked.
On Thu, September 19, 2013 8:46 pm, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:04:04PM +1000, Patrick
Shirkey wrote:
> > 1. Measure the round-trip latency of your sound card (with an
external
analog loop).
>
> Can I use jack_delay running on a second
computer connected to the
external i/o of the first computer to get this value?
You'd measure something different...
But you could use two computers as follows:
A = computer with jack, PA, audacity
B = second computer with sound card, jack and jack_delay.
1. Measure the round-trip latency on B, with an external
analog loop.
2. Connect B -> A, A -> B, run complete chain on A.
3. Measure again on B, subtract the value from (1).
jack_delay -> pa_source -> audacity -> pa_sink -> jack_delay.
Does this look reasonable?
1023.978 frames 21.333 ms total roundtrip latency
extra loopback latency: 1023 frames
use 511 for the backend arguments -I and -O
1023.976 frames 21.333 ms total roundtrip latency
extra loopback latency: 1023 frames
use 511 for the backend arguments -I and -O
1023.977 frames 21.333 ms total roundtrip latency
extra loopback latency: 1023 frames
use 511 for the backend arguments -I and -O
Don't know - I'm by no means a PA expert... and I don't know
your Jack period size. Given PA's reputation I'd expect more:
1024 samples would mean that PA imposes almost the same RT-
requirements on apps as Jack does, and it was designed *not*
to do that... But maybe the jack <-> PA interface doesn't
use the same amount of buffering that PA normally adds.
Note that the value measured is modulo 2^16 samples, but I
wouldn't expect anything more than a second, so this probably
irrelevant.
Here's a bit more detail for discussion before I send this over to the PA
guys for feedback.
I am seeing the time period returned by jack_delay regularly increase
during the measurement process. Do you have any thoughts on why that would
be happening? I would like to rule out jack_delay because this is most
likely a bug in PA that I have come across now.
I'm using this method:
jack is now set to 64/48000/2
This is the graph:
jack_delay -> pa_source -> audacity -> pa_sink -> jack_delay
Using audacity with 0 internal latency and in pass through mode I see the
following results. It starts out as 10.667ms and after a few seconds it
climbs up to 70.667 ms.
I see similar results with ecasound instead of audacity using the
following graph and ecachain:
jack_delay -> pa_source -> ecasound -> pa_sink -> jack_delay
ecasound -f:32,2,48000 -b:64 -i alsa -o alsa
In that case it starts at 60.000 ms and climbs upto 572.000 ms after a few
seconds of running the test.
Console logs here:
http://boosthardware.com/pa-jack-latency.txt
3. If
pa_source and pa_sink are a single Jack client (probably not),
subtract one period from the result of (2).
Can you explain that with the data above?
If they are a single Jack client you create a loop in Jack's
processing graph, this adds one period to the measurement.
> > 4. Add the two values.
>
> I would like to provide an app for this task. Do you think it would be
worthwhile to extend jack_iodelay for this purpose?
Don't see how. You need to do two measurements anyway, no matter how
it's
done, then add or substract.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd