15 May
2003
15 May
'03
1:13 p.m.
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:46:16 +0100, Tim Hall wrote:
On Thursday 15 May 2003 11:20, Steve Harris wrote:
This is a valid point. One problem is that I generaly design them assuming
that there will be a UI at some point, but this has never happened.
I have been considering a mailing list so I can
get consensus on bug
reports, if there are enough interested people I'l set one up.
I've only just started using the swh & ladspa plug-ins in conjunction with
'sweep'. While we're on this thread my immediate reaction is to the general
labelling - great if you're an engineer - a bit confusing if you're
'just' a
musician trying to make the best of a previously analogue recording. It would
be useful to have a plain language description of what the plug-in is
supposed to do when you bring it up and also what units you're entering,
possibly with a suggested range. Scuse if this is a bit OT, and yes, you're damn
right, I didn't RTFM yet :-)
http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa-swh/docs/ladspa-swh.html ;)
the docs could definatly do with work though.
- Steve