6 Sep
2008
6 Sep
'08
8:54 a.m.
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:50:12PM +0300, Nedko
Arnaudov wrote:
For the record: AFAIK DBUS is perfectly capable of networked operation.
As far as I know Arnold Krille already has it running networked for one
of his experiments. It's a rather undocumented feature though, and I
could be wrong. I didn't try it myself (yet).
And even if it's not, there is no reason why a simple OSC<->lash bridge
could not be built. IMHO that definitely beats writing a custom session
manager.
Greets,
Pieter
Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)kokkinizita.net>
writes:
Probably 0.5 then.
Dbus is not the solution, it's not networked. The first app
I'd like to use LASH for uses four networked computers, three
of them headless, which is why I want a session manager.
Guess I'll have to brew my own then. I'll embrace LASH as soon as its authors bump
up the
version number and convert it to OSC, and allow app
developers to use this directly instead of passing
through a library that doesn't fit in at all with the
architecture of my apps. It's actually *very close*
to being OSC, the effort required would be minimal.
(posted almost the same a year ago)
Do you talk about lash 0.5.x or about the new
development, 0.6.x that
uses dbus instead of custom protocol (and is not released yet)?