10 Nov
2021
10 Nov
'21
1:20 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:48 PM Peter P. <peterparker(a)fastmail.com> wrote:
* Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> [2021-11-09 19:18]:
Well for me personally the fact that I wrote (a lot of) it seems sort
of important :)
The integration of a2jmidid is probably one the better features of
JACK1 over JACK2. The integration of zita_a2j/j2a is also a big plus
but alas, I did not keep it up to date with Fons' own code, and the
version inside JACK1 is markedly inferior. As a result I'm still
running zita_a2j despite the possibility of using the integrated
version.
JACK1 is just "more right" than JACK2, but JACK2 has features that
lots of people think they want: integration with dBus, parallelism
when the data flow permits it. click-free connections.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:41 AM Peter P.
<peterparker(a)fastmail.com> wrote:
Do you see any advantages of JACK1 still? Thanks!
Thanks Paul, indeed I am using JACK1. Largely because I remember
having had some problems / incompatibilities with JACK2 in the past.
Then this is one of the "costs" of using JACK1 (and was one of the
major motivations for JACK2) _______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user