23 Feb
2013
23 Feb
'13
4:41 p.m.
On Sat, February 23, 2013 12:38 am, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:11:44PM -1000, david
wrote:
vi was user friendly when it was developed... when memory was tight and
more than one variable would get stored per byte, when a non-volatile
drive was 1/4 meg. Oh, and of coarse look at the users it was being
friendly to.
--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
K3B takes the power approach: You want the power,
you got the power.
Here's hoping you know how to use it! ;-)
Imagine the state vi/vim would be in if it was decided being user
friendly was more important than features!