17 May
2011
17 May
'11
4:46 a.m.
On 17 May 2011 11:14, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
excellent.
i see, thanks. my knowledge of jack is weaker than i thought
--
robin
http://bumblepuppy.org/blog/?p=237 - government bill to remove basic
human rights in NZ
can anyone
answer this? given that linuxsampler relies on jack1, is it
able to use jack2? is it only a matter of forcing the dependencies? or
does ls need to be changed at the code level?
linuxsampler does NOT rely on jack1. it may have an error/weakness in its build scripts but
that is not the
same thing at all.
ok - how/where would i submit a bug report?
alternatively,
are there any wrappers which allow jack1 applications
to use jack2?
there are no known applications that have a dependency on any
implementation of JACK.