9 Jun
2006
9 Jun
'06
1:36 a.m.
On 5/31/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell(a)joe-job.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 11:59 -0500, Gian Paolo Mureddu
wrote:
Why do you want to recompile the kernel? It should Just Work with the
FC5 kernel. In fact there is no config option to disable the nice and
rtprio rlimits. This is why it's easier than realtime LSM - no kernel
patching is required.
I believe if you set a hard limit without also setting the soft limit
it will leave the soft limit at the default. On FC5 the default limit
for rtprio is 0 and memlock is 32k or so. I think you can use '-' to
set both the soft and hard limit, so the above would become:
* - rtprio 99
* - nice -20
* - memlock 500000
Tim.
PS: I read the thread, but the e-mail containing
the pam controls was
accidentally erased, were those the ones needed with this patch?
Add to /etc/security/limits.conf something like:
* hard rtprio 99
* hard nice -20
* soft nice -20
* hard memlock 500000
There is some anecdotal evidence that "memlock" does not work. I have
not investigated it yet.
Lee