3 Sep
2014
3 Sep
'14
8:24 p.m.
On 09/03/2014 07:06 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:28:23 +0100
Filipe Coelho <falktx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is my thing with it. I'd rather have the full focus on Zyn instead
of having 2 separate versions.
Some stuff will end up in Yoshimi that Zyn will not have and vice-versa.
With time the code will differ so much that changes can't be applied to
one another.
When Zyn did not have a maintainer Yoshimi seemed like the right thing,
but this is no longer the case.
On 09/01/2014 12:21 AM, Jonathan E Brickman
wrote:
You know, I'm beginning to get a little
tired of comments like this.
Nobody is twisting your arm. If you don't want to use Yoshimi... then don't.
However why do you think you need to try and dissuade anyone else from doing so?
Do you know Yoshimi's roadmap? No of course you don't. I'd guess you
don't even
know what Yoshimi can currently do.
While I intend to keep file compatibility with ZynAddSubFX as far as possible,
we are going on a different ride - and I see no reason to reveal exactly what
this is to such a hostile audience.
As well as having the opportunity to take Yoshimi in directions I and friends
want, I am learning a great deal about coding in the process. Therefore, even if
I end up being the only person running it, I intend Yoshimi to stay around, at
least as long as I do, so you'd best get used to the idea. I am fascinated by Carla's ability to call
ZASFX. How could this be
implemented for Yoshimi? Are there config files of some sort?
There is no reason
for this to happen.
ZynAddSubFX is more stable nowadays than Yoshimi and being maintained by
a very good developer.
Very soon I'll be releasing a LV2+VST plugin version of Zyn (based on
the last stable release).
Latest Zyn dev/git version now has fully automable parameters,
undo/redo, OSC and UI<->DSP de-coupling (no more using a super ugly
master mutex).
As much as you might want to use Yoshimi, it needs to be let go and
development focused on Zyn instead.