Re: [LAU] Session manager: what about?

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:00:05 +0100 Ivan Tarozzi <itarozzi(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I must admit I only tried briefly, long ago, ladish and jack-session, and for one reason or another I dropped them... recently though I've been trying out non session manager, and I must say I really really like it: pros: + it's dead simple but functional, I'd say it follows the KISS principle + nsm-proxy, which lets you use *any* application in a session + fast session switching for supported apps + supports session management over network The only "cons" I could think of is that ATM *very* few apps support it, but that isn't it's fault right? I actually don't understand this situation, why so many support jack-session but so little nsm (just look at [1] vs [2])? There was a big discussion last year [3] and all the devs that took part in the discussion, except Rui, agreed that it was the best session manager for a variety of reasons... so why so little support for it? cheers, renato [1] http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/categories/jack_session [2] http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/categories/nsm [3] http://www.linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lad/2012/3/22/189119