9 Mar
2009
9 Mar
'09
12:23 p.m.
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:04:02 -0400, "Ivica Ico Bukvic" <ico(a)vt.edu> wrote:
ultimately
Hey Ico,
I'm sorry, but I don't really understand what you mean. While I would
encourage the people from the Debian Multimedia Team to subscribe to a
list
like linux-audio-tuning to discuss tuning issues and grab ideas from
here,
I don't see how we could provide mirroring or any kind of services like
this (we have limited resources), and even if we could, I don't see why
*we* should do it.
If I understood the original mail correctly, this initiative is meant to
be
integrated to *Debian*, and is meant to make the *Debian* distro better,
because it is *Debian* which has issues with linux-audio. Why should
linux-audio chime in ?
Because this is an opportunity to extend distro transparency and allow developers to spend more time on developing
rather than dealing
with
differences between distros.
hmm, ok. I'll give you this one.
Besides, we already mirror UbuntuStudio, JACKlab, and
64Studio, so why
shouldn't we also encourage Debian Multimedia to join the consortium and
in
turn allow them to use whatever resources we may have.
I might have misunderstood something. Is Debian Multimedia a full featured
distro like 64studio or UbuntoStudio or an effort to make debian look
better regarding audio packages ?
My point was : if Debian Multimedia is just an effort to make things better
looking on the audio/multimedia side, then it has more to do with the
"Debian packages and process" group of people than with the linuxaudio
people.
Marc-Olivier Barre.
------
Participez au black-out anti-HADOPI :
http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/APPEL-HADOPI-blackout-du-net-francais