18 Oct
2016
18 Oct
'16
11:51 p.m.
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:28:37 -0400
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
let me offer you a hint.
Good !
what the plugins need to share are not messages but
computer
(analysis) data.
So much for the hint.
normally (though not universally), when entities run
inside a single
process and need to share information, they do so by sharing access to
memory.
This is writing to say nothing. You are going down on choosing the
size and type of bolts when the discussion is obviously at a much
higher, general level.
You have out forward your level of expertise a few times in a few
exchanges in various places.
I will not do likewise, sorry.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:58 PM, jonetsu
<jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:45:10 -0400
> Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:35 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > I disagree on that, based on so many protocols existing out
> > > there that are not proprietary, that can be used openly.
>
> > It isn't about the existence of protocols, it's about the
> > complexity of doing this via protocols at all.
>
> Well, if one uses OSPF to try to do VRRP...