On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:43:09PM -0800, Ken Restivo
wrote:
Question about the alsa_out tool in the JACK
github.
How critical is the libresample portion of the code? What would happen if
I removed it?
i.e. if I were sending, say, one stereo pair to one amp, and another
stereo pair to a different amp, and didn't care about the word clocks
being in sync, do I really need that libresample stuff sucking up
valuable CPU? Or could I whack it? What would be the difficulties
created by doing that? Again, this'd be only for output channels and I
wouldn't need the word clocks to be in sync.
you are confusing things here.
its not about wordclocks being in sync. if your wordclocks are in sync.
you dont need alsa_out.
but most likely your wordclocks are not in sync. this means your
soundcards run at different drifing samplerates, and one soundcard will
consume a different amount of samples per jack cycle. but jack is
feeding period samples each cycle.
first try using -q option set to 0 because that will use linear resampling.
reducing the value of the -s option (default 256) will also improve cpu
usage. but might yield worse performance of the algorithm. it depends a bit
on the soundcards you are using.
Didn't he mention having one physical soundcard with 4 outs that only
presented 2 outs to jack? If so, do any such single physical soundcards
actually have two clocks? The alsa-out trick would just get the other two
outs on the same card to show in jack. Or is my memory acting up this
morning?
all the best,
drew