16 Oct
2006
16 Oct
'06
6:52 p.m.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:49:41 +0200
Nicola Larosa <nico(a)tekNico.net> wrote:
Oh that's alright then :)
Actually I didn't think to look at the headers. I went by the order
they arrived in my in-box.
... I'll get my coat.
--
Will J G
guy wrote:
> Its looking promising
>
> http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9566944929.html
Folderol wrote:
Hey! No Fair! I put this up before you did. How
come your posting time
is lower than mine :(
No, it's not. Folderol's mail has this header:
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:20:06 +0100
while guy's one has this:
> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:22:24 +0100