22 Jan
2007
22 Jan
'07
11:16 a.m.
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:26 +0100
Leonard Ritter <contact(a)leonard-ritter.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Thomas Kuther
wrote:
Yes, I (and maybe others) would be interested. I never heard of it
before and am just starting to see what it is good for.
Currently all i know about it is that it tends to cause massive
headaches for packagers and others trying to compile it :)
I understand that Aldrin w/o lunar, ladspa, dssi
or anything is
pretty pointless, right?
actually, ladspa and dssi were not meant to be supported. i did the
wrappers only for fun, in fact i think it's a terrible idea to have
them at all.
lunar is important, and llvm is a heavy dependency, i agree. perhaps i
can swap llvm for gcc, which everybody should have...
if you are interested in the reason why llvm is included at all, i can
perhaps explain a little.