Re: [linux-audio-user] midi note numbers

Hallo, Brad Fuller hat gesagt: // Brad Fuller wrote: Well, being a saxophone player (in the past) it doesn't sound *that* crazy to me. Why? The sax (usually) is a transposing instrument. Tenor or soprano sax are tuned in Bb, alt saxophones are tuned in Eb. If you put your fingers in the "C"-position, the actual frequency coming out would correspond to a Bb or Eb on the piano, depending on sax model. And of course with tenor and soprano sax the same finger settings also result in a completely different octave. Now what should midi do about it? Remember, there are not only midi keyboards, there also are midi wind instruments, midi guitars etc. and there are keyboards with various numbers of keys. It sounds sensible from a keyboard point of view to just put 60, which is about the middle of 0-127 as the middle C key. Where this middle C key is, of course depends on the keyboard model. For a software synthesizer you don't have a real middle key, you only have frequencies. It makes sense to spread out the available 127 pitch numbers so that they span most of the pitches that are musically useful. The lowest "C" that is useful seems to be the one at about 8Hz. The C below that would be at about 4Hz which is not perceived as a pitch anymore. You get to use the ~8Hz as lowest C if you define pitch 69 as corresponding to 440Hz. On the other end of the scale you get about 12500 Hz for a midi pitch of 127. This is about half of the nyquist frequency at 44.1kHz samplerate so there still would be a bit of headroom. However there won't be a lot of headroom: You will pass a 22.05kHz Nyquist at a pitch of 137 if you interpolate the midi formula for 69=440Hz this way: mtof(137)=22350.6 So using "69 midi pitch := 440Hz" in a software syntesizer as default range makes a lot of sense. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__