1 Dec
2004
1 Dec
'04
3:16 p.m.
--- Ryan Gallagher <ruinaudio(a)comcast.net> wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 08:47 -0800, Mark Knecht
wrote:
I think it's on the development roadmap. Maybe not.
It's an important feature.
I recently lost a remix and master job because it was
recorded in PT. I didn't really want the job anyway
but if I did it would have cost them to much to have
me deal with it.
ron
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:16:16 +0100 (CET), Kjetil
Svalastog Matheussen
<k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> wrote:
>
>
> Mark Knecht:
> >
> > BTW - I truly think that in the next 12-24
months Digi will release
> > PTLE for Linux
> What digidesign should do, is to make their
own
specialized distribution
> of linux to run protools
I agree about rolling their own distro. That
makes
tons of sense for
the Pro Market
I'm so sorry to be the one to inject the reality
(read: doom and gloom)
here... there's absolutely no way in hell Avid will
ever hire/train or
otherwise enlist linux developers to create a whole
freaking new
distro.... ever.
They're not in the OS business, and never will be...
I was suggesting
the very remote and distant possiblity of a
linux-embedded automated
console... not a distro.
I'll bet the house on this one -> DigiDesign will
not become a linux
distributor/vendor.
We really should all be throwing our shoulders
behind ardour, working to
make a DAW better than PT anyway. Mark, maybe we
should raise the issue
of PTLE interoperability on the ardour-dev list
again? Paul was open to
it when last it came up... it was just disecting
that session
format/file standing in the way IIRC. -ry
--
Ryan Gallagher <ruinaudio(a)comcast.net>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com