I'm posting this just as a perspective ...
I would rather use *BSD.
for 2 reasons:
reason 1: (not really relevant here)
I like unix at its roots, it just makes me feel good.
reason 2: (totally effin relevant)
The BSDs don't have this fractured user base.
Sure you can switch between Net* Open* and Free* (Dragon* too),
but you do that for big reasons *UP-FRONT*.
Its frustrating how fractured linux has become.
(But, maybe it always was.)
Switching distros *IS* a solution.
Switching distros *IS* a solution that should only
happen *ONCE* because your switching from a bad distro.
unix/linux is beautiful (in one sense, not all) because it lasts.
You can come back to a system that been sitting in a closet
(or sitting at a colo, doing its job) *YEARS* later, and
there it is. The computer. Working. Working well.
That's really nice.
I use linux because of ALSA, period.
We need to realize that an audio workstation is not a "server".
It is obvious that realtime takes precedence over security in
"audio land". (I don't mean that in a bad way at all.)
BUT, linux is still a server OS too. Its kind of everything.
uhmm, i don't remember what my point was, but i wrote too much
to delete it....
--
paul w
hello,
i don't think this should be a discussion about changing the dists!!!
moving to another distribution should be the last thing to do!
and for better reasons then only a package that is newer or "better"
or "easier" to handle.
this is nonsense!
btw, the libpam-modules package w/ rlimits is also in DeMuDi
(from "http://demudi.agnula.org/images/1.2.1/README.PACKAGES":
libpam-modules 0.76-22)
and debian sarge and the current ubuntu (both also version 0.76-22).
vlad