17 Feb
2011
17 Feb
'11
7:09 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:50 PM, S. Massy <lists(a)smassy.andropov.org> wrote:
-t 100 isn't "extra grace period". it overrides however long JACK
would have waited (typically fractionally less than one period).
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:35:43PM -0500, Paul Davis
wrote:
why are you
using -t100 ?
A leftover from my non-RT kernel, but I gigured it wasn't bad to
give
processes an extra grace period. Can this have negative side-effects in
any way?