4 Aug
2009
4 Aug
'09
4:58 p.m.
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 19:11:53 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:52 AM,
eviltwin69@cableone.net<eviltwin69@cableone.net> wrote:
> On Tue Aug 4 14:09 , Arnold Krille sent:
>>On Tuesday 04 August 2009 12:36:40 Jan Depner wrote:
>>> There really isn't much we can add to it. In fact, I think we probably
>>> want to remove a couple of things ;-)
>>For example that 10ms delay so it gets (more) usable for live-foh usage?
>> ;-)
> Unfortunately, I don't think there's any hope for that. That's just
> processing overhead. I was thinking more of the per band delays. I
> added those, mostly just for fun and to learn how the processing worked.
> They make a minor difference in the output but not enough to warrant
> keeping them.
I talked to the main-devs (was it steve harris) one or several times. As far
as I remember the 10ms delay is because of the math in either the EQ or the X-
over for the compressors, don't remember exactly which. And there is probably
no way to cirumvent that.
Hmm, maybe DSP-expert Fons has something in his toolbox?
Just my personal POV, and not that it can't be
used live, but the
concept of using Jamin 'live' really wasn't what the original purpose
was which was more a mastering plugin to address what we were missing
from the Waves stuff as we came to Linux.
Well, I have seen people use a three-band studio compressor from the
mastering-rack on tour for foh. And everyone uses a 31band EQ live (or at
least should). So I actually tried to use jamin as master-effect once. Worked
okay from the sound-perspective but the musicians and speakers complained
about the delay (was a rather small room).
Jamin's been a great too for me as it is.
For me too!
But that doesn't let me stop dreaming. :-)
Have fun,
Arnold