8 Apr
2005
8 Apr
'05
3:29 p.m.
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:36 +0200, John Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 10:10 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Judging from the release candidates, 2.6.12 should give you better
latency than Windows or OSX OOTB. With Ingo's patches it's *much*
better.
If you don't need sub-millisecond latencies then 2.6.12 vanilla should
work great.
Lee
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 08:10 +0100, anahata
wrote:
OK, so using 2.6.12 provides better latencies that 2.4.x with pre-empt +
lowlatency patches?
Or do we still need to apply Ingo's patches to 2.6.12?
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0400, Lee
Revell wrote:
2.6.12 should be out within a week or two. And my tests with 2.6.12-rc1
show it's even better than 2.6.11. So if you're still on 2.4 you might
want to wait. Or just use 2.6. 2.6.11 OOTB has better latency
than 2.4 with those
patches.
At last! Am I right in thinking that this is the first release of 2.6 of
which that's true? Time for an upgrade, as I see Debian's up to 2.6.11 now.