11 Nov
2005
11 Nov
'05
3:19 p.m.
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 12:22 +0100, Florian Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:10:20 -0500
Lee Revell <rlrevell(a)joe-job.com> wrote:
I do have some data to back this up, I ran about 100 million samples
with 2.6.14 and the biggest latency I saw was ~0.6 ms. For the buffer
sizes he wants to use 2.6.14 will work fine. Of course you won't be
able to sustain quite as high a DSP load but given the problems people
are having with the -rt kernel on x64 it's worth investigating.
Lee
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 17:05 -0800, thewade
wrote:
Oh well, not for everyone. If you want to be sure and have no xrun
whatsoever a -rt kernel is definetly the better choice imho (don't have
data to back that up though) I am curious how to get PD running on my machine
processing complex patches but with a latency of 5.33 msec (128 frame
buffer size I think) or less. I would even settle fo 10msec (256) with
no XRUNS.
You don't need the -rt kernel for that, the standard kernel will work.
Lee