30 Aug
2017
30 Aug
'17
1:16 a.m.
On Aug 29, 2017 03:39, "Peter P." <peterparker(a)fastmail.com> wrote:
* list <list(a)contacte.xyz> [2017-08-29 15:25]:
I think there is some disagreement over whether hard RT is needed for audio work. I think
hard RT is meant more for systems running manufacturing hardware.
My systems work just fine for audio work using Debian's and KXStudio's -rt
kernels. Is KXStudio's kernel hard RT or low-latency?
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
apt-daily.timer loaded active waiting Daily apt
download activities
Which you can disable safely.
and
remote-fs.target loaded active active Remote File Systems
Can be disabled as
well I think.
Not sure they are vital. But i see nothing about
them on the journalctl
that matches the time of the XRUN - the apt-daily time occurs like 1
time every 8 hours or so.
Did you look at jackd priorities?
The Card(s) are alone on they interrupt line -
already manage that -
thank linux audio wiki & others, well explained and documented, and
still up to date.
Thank you again for reading you all ! Appreciate that a lot !
ps : I think it was a wrong routed message from David. J but i do not
want a RT Kernel (do i really need one ?!) for my simple recording
needs. A good low latency, well configured Kernel should do the trick.
As far as
I understand, if I may chime in, the -rt kernel from the
Debian packages does implement several realtime patches, but not all of
them and is not a completely hard realtime kernel. You should at least
install one in parallel to your existing kernel and give it a try to
rule this possibility out and not lose time over speculations.