24 Mar
2009
24 Mar
'09
7:07 a.m.
frank pirrone wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Can someone confirm or reject this thesis?
\r
frank pirrone wrote:
Not in my experience. It's not a demanding audio task. Others may
report differently. Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Thanks all. Interesting suggesting Frank...
Btw. Does it matter for quality what soundcard is used?
garry.ogle(a)tiscali.co.uk wrote:
> frank pirrone wrote:
>
>
>> I'd also look into Gramofile:
>> for pop/click filtering and automatic breaking of a continuous
>> recording into "tracks" or songs. It can be used for
>> post-processing the recordings you make.
>> I'd also look into Gramofile:
>>
> I'd recommend gnome-wave-cleaner for post-processing:
>
> http://gwc.sourceforge.net/
>
+1 for Gnome Wave Cleaner. I successfully digitalized 50+ years old
persian
music LP's using this app.
--
Olivier
_______________________________________________
Yeah, me too. It's a fine program, but my reason for referring
the
OP to Gramofile was primarily its functionality for breaking a
continuous recording into individual tracks or songs based upon the
silence between as delimiter.
Anyone have another program recommendation for that operation?
Of course it's easy enough to manually split a waveform where one
tune ends and another begins, but if one were digitizing an entire
record collection that would be beyond onerous. Also DAO can
certainly handle impressing that continuous recording onto optical
media, but that's not the same as having individual files - for any
of a number of purposes.