30 May
2009
30 May
'09
8:10 p.m.
I agree about the Dr_Pepper/Mr_Pibb nature of the question. But, I
was only referring to the number of times the audio crosses the A/D
then D/A boundary. In my mind, the fewer the better. All the other
issues, automation, etc., are less of a concern for me.
Cheers....
On 30 May 2009 at 16:21, Ricus Vincente <wizardofgosz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 13:14 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove
wrote:
This is one of those coke/pepsi hornets-nest questions.
I guess it depends upon how much I like the automation in Ardour.
Plus your question has two levels. The convenience of the automation
in the DAW, vs. the automation in the console, and the different
question of preferring the way mixing in the box sounds over mixing
through analog gear.
There's no question in my mind that I always want my audio passing
through analog gear on the way out (I'm taking about good analog gear
here, not crap).
Keeping the faders on my console at unity and making automation moves
with the DAW is something that is amenable to me.
Best,
Rich...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
Kevin
I'm
mostly interested in transport controls. A control surface with
faders would come in handy some times, but for mixing we have an actual
analog console (a cool vintage piece at that).
Once you're in the digital domain, are you sure you'd want to go back
to analog for the mixing?
--
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user