5 Jul
2008
5 Jul
'08
9:15 p.m.
schoappied wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
o ja, the normal kernel 25.2 works just fine.... no problems with
reading the file system or something and no BUG message.....
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:46 AM, schoappied
<schoappied(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
whow, Ive spend I think 20 hours to build a kernel but it constantly
fails.... :( :( :(
I tried everything with help from IRC and documentation, but different
errors...
for example: http://pastebin.com/m5bc649d
I use a kernel for kernel.org and a rt-patch which fits it...
I patch the files as described in this howto:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=17035&postdays=0&postorder…
I use: make oldconfig (skip the questions with ENTER) and then make
xconfig
And set:
rocessor type and features> Preemption Mode (Complete Preemption
(Real-Time))
Processor type and features>Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
Then:
$ make-kpkg clean ; export VER=$(date +'%Y%m%d')
NAMEEXT="-$(hostname)-$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)"; make-kpkg
--revision=$VER --append-to-version=$NAMEEXT --rootcmd fakeroot
--initrd kernel_image kernel_headers
Can it fails because of the new kernel versions I try to build?
Or do I make errors in making the .config file?
This is my hardware, maybe someone can help me making the .config file
or give me advice for editing xconfig?
http://pastebin.com/m410fbc40
thanks in advance and for the guys at this part of the world, sleep
well, others have a good day!
I've read on the debian irc channel that it
is not necessary to do a
rt-patch with the newest kernels (.25.10), just set in menu config:
processor type and features >> preemtible kernel (low -latency
desktop)
and Timer frequentie to 1000 Hz.
Can anyone confirm this?
Not at all true. That strategy will give you a good kernel, but it is
not a 'real-time' kernel. You're best bet is to use the specific patch
set supplied by Ingo and the RT team.
Hope this helps,
Mark