14 May
2013
14 May
'13
11:21 a.m.
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 06:10 -0300, Iain Mott wrote:
Hi Flo,
This is what was said:
"The MF-I and MF-II's AD/DA conversion latencies vary slightly (MF-II is
slightly quicker) - you won't get "Sample accurate" I/O across MF-I to
MF-II"
But Flo does get sample accuracy :D or was he floing?!
You mention the multiface 2 is faster too. Will there
be a
problem-causing delay between the multiface 1 and 2 channels, a
difference in sound quality, or both?
Is there no dealer near to you, who enables testing?
For my RME to ADAT sync by ADAT, not WC, is audible, if I use one IO
from the RME and the other from the ADA8000. I wouldn't use it that way,
but I guess sync between the MFs could be much better. Somebody from RME
would use such a combination (RME AIO + ADA8000 one IO from each
device), since it's still like moving a microphone a little bit.
Tastes differ!
What would be your suggestion for 16 outs on linux?
I'm not necessarily limited to expanding upon the Multiface/HDSP that I
already have for this project, although saving money is certainly a good
thing!
Thanks,
Iain
Em Ter, 2013-05-14 às 06:34 +0200, Florian Faber escreveu:
The Multiface 1 and 2 have different converters.
Depending on what you
want to achieve, this is probably not what you want (the converters in
the Multiface 2 are faster).
What do you mean with "the sync wouldn't be sample-accurate"? Multiple
cards can be started and stopped at exactly the same buffer position.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user