18 Feb
2005
18 Feb
'05
3:47 a.m.
On Thu, 17 Feb, 2005 at 12:30PM -0500, Lee Revell spake thus:
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 17:13 +0000,
james(a)dis-dot-dat.net wrote:
I think LAU is great, and I certainly wouldn't unsubscribe just
because there is another list with a smaller focus.
I have found in the past, though, that "Look what I made!" posts get
ignored. Or at least it looks like that. I'm sure people listen and
have opinions, but don't actually take the time to write them down for
everyone else to read.
A place to post where you *know* people will give useful critisism
will hopefully get more people to open up and put their creations in
the public eye (ear?).
It could also fail miserably and just be a silent ghost-town of a
list. Whatever happens, trying it can't hurt.
James
On Thu, 17 Feb, 2005 at 02:32PM +0100, Esben
Stien spake thus:
Personally I think music made with Linux should just be posted on LAU.
No one ever said this was a "Linux audio tech" list. It's just "A
list
for Linux audio users". james(a)dis-dot-dat.net writes:
Well, I did think about this. I know RMS would be spinning in his
grave if he were dead. Thing is, it fit with LAD and LAU. Linux
Audio Music doesn't even make much sense - it suggests that there's a
possibility of non-audio music.
I've started a list for posting music made
with Linux.
I think this is a great idea, /me signs up. Only thing, I only
recognize linux as the kernel of the GNU system, so the name is just
adding to the confusion, in my opinion. Lee
--
"I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated
Development
That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you."
(By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)