22 Jul
2007
22 Jul
'07
5:32 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:24:48PM -0500, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will
handle 4,8, or 16 cores
well?
Seablade
On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen(a)notam02.no> wrote:
>
>
>"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede(a)gmail.com>
>>
>> I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right
>now?
>
>No.
>
>
It is a long and somewhat involved (and, I got the impression, touchy and sensitive)
topic.
Paul and Stephane provided long, well-thought-out, and detailed explanations of the issues
on the jackit-devel list earlier this year.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1176687721.10933.1…
My (oversimplified) understanding is: jackdmp will use as many processors as you've
got, but how well and how granular it does it, depends on how you have your chain of
connections set up, and to what degree your application software (softsynths, effects
processors, DAW's, sequencers, etc.) exploit those opportunities for parallelism
internally.
- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGo7Cxe8HF+6xeOIcRAmw3AJ0VhtCH6vIqw+QifpW6S3ahWApbEACeOXUs
KKQEAoBO30ddWEnDRlre/E4=
=FxAQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----