30 Dec
2004
30 Dec
'04
11:19 p.m.
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 17:08, Russell Hanaghan wrote:
:) Kind of a contradiction considering where I'm writing to...
What I mean is, I need that production box to work. So before I go mess
it all up, I want something stable ~ ish. At least as stable as the mdk
2.6.7-mm.7 kernel has been.
tim hall wrote:
[I don't understand the 'I don't want to try anything new' part... :-]
Last Thursday 30 December 2004 06:34, Bill &
Kath Worsfold "Songs" was like:
The AGNULA folks need to do some serious updating to their website??
Unless all they have is 7 audio applications...I assume there is more
recent stuff in a repository somewhere?
I use Mandrake and Thac's but it is a bit of a pain at the moment with
the 2.6 kernel stuff and the latest distro is not likely to work at all
with the 2.4 kernel.
I've been tempted many times to try CCRMA but untill someone can spout a
reliable RT kernel in packaged form with all the most recent updates,
whatever the distro may be, I don't want to try anything new.
Should I get DeMuDi, or can I make the music
applications work with
Mandrake? Is latency the main issue to watch out for, or are there
others I'm not aware of?
I'd seriously recommend DeMuDi-1.2.0
http://download.agnula.org/1.2/1.2.0/demudi_1.2.0_i386.iso
Probably the easiest install so long as you know your hardware doesn't need to
use non-free drivers.
Just for balance I have to say that PlanetCCRMA is also worth looking at.
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/
Mandrake also works well with thac's rpms;
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/index10.0.html
http://rpm.nyvalls.se/sound10.0.html
Mandrake doesn't use apt, so it can be slightly more fiddly for Linux newbies
to install all the music apps. If you already know you prefer Mandrake, then
stick with it. You should have access to a similar range of software.
It's probably best to get a working system going with most of the available
Linux Audio packages. If you use one of the music-oriented distros then you
can let people like Free Ekanayaka, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano, Thac and
the rest of the LADs who populate these lists worry about things like latency
issues for you. It's hard to talk about these things in the abstract.
Have Fun.
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk
Ha, a "reliable RT kernel" does not really
exist at this point in time
(IMHO). The best low latency performance in the 2.6.x series can only be
obtained by using Ingo Molnar's realtime preempt patch. The latest
version (and maybe also the underlying 2.6.10-rc3-mm1 as well) is not a
model of stability... But when it works, it works very well indeed.
""reliable RT kernel" does not really exist at this point in
time(IMHO)"
It would seem this is true. But the 2.4 kernel was stable and reliable.
I'm sure 2.6 will get there too, even if it is 20 releases away.
Check out the top entries at the Planet CCRMA log:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/changelog.html
There are now a couple of new kernels there, both bleeding edge (with
the realtime preempt patch version 0.7.33-04) and conservative (vanilla
2.6.10).
-- Fernando
Do these have the Realtime-lsm patch too? I don't want to run as root.
Give's me the willies! :)
R~