On Friday 13 August 2004 06:54 am, Florian Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:13:02 -0400
Dave Phillips <dlphilp(a)bright.net> wrote:
Linux Sound HOWTO July 2001
ALSA Sound mini-HOWTO November 1999
Linux MIDI HOWTO May 2002
Linux MP3 HOWTO December 2001
Worse, the LDP's own documentation refers back to these out-of-date
pieces, making sure that readers continue to be misinformed. I mean no
critique of the excellent LPD, but it seems to me that as a community
we have an obligation to correct this situation. For all the talk
about improving documentation, here's a chance for anyone to get
directly involved. The format for these HOWTOs is simple and already
laid out: what's needed is currency, someone to correct and update the
basic sound & music oriented HOWTOs. Otherwise it might be better if
we asked the LDP to remove the docs in order to mitigate confusion.
I'm a big fan of wikis. They make it so easy for the user to contribute
I was a big fan of sniffing glue at one time ;)
documentation. Have a look at
alsa.opensrc.org. It
surpasses the
official alsa site in many places wrt the available
information/documentation. And if it didn't it were a great addition
anyways.
So while i'm not saying that every open source project should use a wiki
for their primary documentation site, they should definetly think about
using a wiki as secondary more uptodate user contributed documentation
source..
Actually, if that was the de facto standard way of doing things, the situation
would be a lot better than it currently is. Reality though? If I wanted to be
a jackass, I could go wipe out every wiki or plant bogus info. Would you
trust something that open for use with win32? Human nature.
With some effort the rather wild and often
unstructured collection of
information that a wiki is can be refactored and flow back into the main
doc.
That's the weakness - it's a crapshoot that this will be done. Otherwise
wiki is the proverbial tree falling in the woods.
My suggestion would be: Transfer the above listed
HOWTO's into wiki's
and see what happens :)
"I fixed my problems by doing rm -rf / as root"
Seriously: Some sort of revision control with granular authorization and the
ability to tag things as SGML would be useful additions to wiki.