17 Feb
2013
17 Feb
'13
5:49 p.m.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:36:46 +0800
Simon Wise <simonzwise(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 18/02/13 00:22, Len Ovens wrote:
It's not so much the mail client as the list settings and the headers it
adds to the email (though some clients are broken with regards to this).
For me, using the Sylpheed client, a simple reply comes back to the list,
while a reply-all goes to the sender with a cc: to the list, which would
cause the original sender to get the message twice. When replying to a
list, you hardly ever want to reply-all.
--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh(a)brainiac.com
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
On Sun, February 17, 2013 4:00 am, Chris Bannister wrote:
I thought most email clients have supported reply-to-list based on List-id for ages?
[No need to include me in the reply, I'm
subscribed to the list]
Unfortunately, this list does not add a replyto: field so the only way of
getting things to the list is with reply all.... or spend time messing
with all the header fields.