On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 12:13 +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
Too many variables are involved in music listening,
more than the
"statistic pornografy" of an ABX test can take into accunt IMO
(university degree in statistics).
Correct, science does know "change blindness", but as mentioned before,
I experienced also "change deafness" (seems to be a term in English too,
but I don't know it from German psychology).
If you add an instrument, e.g. a cowbell or if you change a note played
by a kick, by a 1/16 note, many non-musicians don't notice a difference,
for a musician it could be a very hard and unmistakable difference.
People who are educated in listening, do listen completely different to
music. To notice a difference has less to do with the quality of the
ears, as long as the ears aren't damaged, education makes the big
difference.
I noticed that people who are educated in listening to music, do listen
quasi very seldom to music, at least compared to the less educated
listeners. Averaged people turn on a radio where ever they are, what
ever they do and listen to what ever they blast, more musical educated
people seldom consume music that way.