5 Mar
2010
5 Mar
'10
7:46 a.m.
Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to do what it was ment
for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So
its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were
to push LASH developement, it wouldn't change anything. I mean to force
audio apps, which use Jack, to use LASH as well. For me it is super
important, to be able to save the whole session with one click. There
are so many standalone jack apps out there, which I'd like to use for
recording. I simply don't rewiring everything that belongs to project
everytime I work on it.
To get specific, say you have a project with Ardour, Hydrogen,
Rosegarden, 3x Zynadd, 5x freqtweak. Since the last 2 aren't available
as plugins (what's the status of zynjack, it seems abandoned), you 11
apps! This setup seems crazy, but freqtweak is soooo cool, I'd like to
use multiple instances as inserts in ardour.
I just don't feel like firing 11 apps, and wiring them everytime.
Gerald
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 14:20 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
If you can finance LASH development by giving jobs to
2-3 dedicated
coders - it might be a good way to force it. Other than that I am not
sure.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gerald Mwangi <gerald.mwangi(a)gmx.de>
wrote:
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives.
It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply
don't seem
to care about session management. So my idea is just to force
them to.
Gerald
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:47 +0300, alex stone wrote:
I disagree with LASH inclusion in jack itself.
There is work going to consider alternatives at the moment.
Alex.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev