28 Sep
2006
28 Sep
'06
8:20 a.m.
On Monday 25 September 2006 15:04, Lee Revell was like:
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 15:39 +0200, Malte Steiner
wrote:
Two's up on that. My video card is one of the few that doesn't require
proprietary drivers, however its DRI has been broken in Debian testing for
the last few months and the fix has been a long time coming. It would have
been very annoying to not to have been able to join in the fun. Fortunately,
I am getting an idea of what Bristol can do, albeit with a few problems,
which I'll go into when I've had time to investigate properly. Now I'm really
looking forward to the possible development of a virtual Synthi size A.
:)
--
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim
We are the people We've been waiting for.
Hi,
3D hardware acceleration requires a proprietary driver on most machines.
Please don't make it a requirement. no optimisation and yes, that is now noticable.
Since the transparency
layer is also going to be used for other features I will work on some
changes.
just a suggestion:
i didn't looked into the sources so what do you use for GUI painting?
How about using OpenGL? It should run hardware accellerated on recent
machines and comes with transparency, image rotation (read: knobs!),
colorization and sizing included.