1 Mar
2005
1 Mar
'05
12:34 p.m.
Spencer Russell <Spencer.Russell(a)oberlin.edu> writes:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:04:02AM -0500, Joe Hartley
wrote:
Er, no, thats actually very easy, just reset its value to 1 whenever it hits
0. You can write to any controller of the BC{R,F}2000 to set its current
value.
--
CYa,
Mario
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:02:31 +0100
Mario Lang <mlang(a)delysid.org> wrote:
I think I would prefer the dial to send relative information as
to what direction it's turning, so that you can have more than
127 different values controlled by one knob. It's not exceedingly
difficult to take a wrapping controller and make it functionally
the same, but if the encoder just stops at 0 and 127, it makes
that impossible.
Yes, it is, and I consider this behaviour the only sensible.
For me, the other dials (those that wrap) are broken, and
they are a serious accessibility hassle.
I'm with Mario on this. The last thing I'd want to have happen is to
have a parameter wrap from full off to full on because the controller
sent out a value of 3..2..1..0..127.