3 Jun
2010
3 Jun
'10
10:02 a.m.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:26 AM, drew Roberts <zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 16:37:41 Chris Cannam
wrote:
Yes, I think you're both right -- my mistake.
Chris
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Niels Mayer
<nielsmayer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Actually, I read it like Niels, Chris. Where http://isophonics.net/QMVampPlugins says
"These plugins are
provided in binary form only and may be used for any purpose, or
redistributed for non-commercial purposes only." -- so I guess I'm
good if the QmVampPlugin is provided as a "web service API"
Well, the implication is that that's OK if you're not making money from it.