20 Jun
2006
20 Jun
'06
2:38 p.m.
--- Stephen Cameron <smcameron(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
--- R Parker <rtp405(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
It's really a very nice, convenient machine for
tracking.
Until you want to record and monitor 8+ tracks. And
then it's infuriating.
Not so good for editing, and there's no
nice
way to get things into or out of it. Mostly
what little music I do is internet collaborations,
so I end up with a process like this:
download/decode tracks (mp3 ->wav), burn cds,
import tracks to AW, record my parts, burn cds,
import tracks to pc, encode/upload. Rather tedious.
I think you can redesign for a much better studio. Is
your PC hardware capable of running jackd without
xruns?
Would be nice to transform that process to:
download/decode tracks, transfer to AW over ADAT
cables, record my parts, transfer to PC over ADAT
cables, encode/upload tracks.
Don't use the HDR but use the mixer and monitoring
interfaces with i/o routed to the RME card all the
time. Record to the AW HDR at a remote locations;
practice space, bar, etc.
I'm looking at your setup while occupied with
something else. Am I overlooking your reasons for
recording to the AW?
Ron
That's where I'm trying to get to.
-- steve
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com