Re: [linux-audio-user] This criticism of jackd valid?

Chris Metzler wrote: Ha! So a better alternative is what then?? ARTS!?...ESD? OSS?? Maybe "shes" a Widows user! (unnecessary slur there..I'm a windows user for some things but it seemed as informed and appropriate as the authors theme!) To me, within the authors own text, one of Jack's supreme capabilities was clearly highlighted... "You *can* still get Jack to work perfectly with 2ms latency (and hundreds of people do)," And I am yet to see a developer of a RT kernel who doesn't take great care in stating the possible negative effects of running RT kernels. And if Jack sucks SO much, why has it become the most popular audio medium for All serious Audio applications? I know Paul and crew have sufficiently thick skin to not be dented by this clown but it must be supremely irritating to have your work criticized in this manner, especially when no *better* solutions are offered up! I give /. "anonymous coward" a big <oh brother> and a "see a therapist over petty jealousy issues" for this weeks show! R