18 Mar
2004
18 Mar
'04
11:36 a.m.
Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 06:49:03AM -0800, Mark Knecht
wrote:
Yeah. See part of my thought is that I *want* to master at 24-bit, get
things right with EQ and compression, then add dithering and make sure
it doesn't mess things up. To do that last step I want to go back and
forth between 24-bit and 16-bit dithered, most especially on fade outs
and in quiet passages, etc. I don't see how Daniel could do this with
the setup he's proposing.
What he could do is choose different dithering algorhythms and compare
how each sounded, which is important, but if they *all* mess things up
he won't know that.
Dithering is a really interesting issue. One a few things I've done it's
been important. On many type of source material it seems to make little
or no difference. Much to learn. Bob Katz's book has some really
interesting sections on this subject. If you don't do everything right
in front of the dither, then dithering will make no difference at all.
Anyway, it's just an observation about the system he's proposing to build.
- Mark
I will also point out that you would not, I think,
be able to hear the
direct effects of your choice of dither in this setup. All audio you
send to this unit would have to be dithered so all you could do would be
make a comparitive judgement. While that might suit your needs, it's not
optimum and as far as mastering goes really a pretty big limitation
depending on the source material you might be working with.
Thats a very good point - the dithering used by jackd to produce 16bit
output should be reproducable when you go to burn CDs, otherwise the sound
on the final CD will be subtly different.
Hmm... thinking...
- Steve