5 Aug
2011
5 Aug
'11
1:06 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:43 AM, rosea grammostola
<
rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If we are going to go to the effort of setting up a campaign we should be
prepared to attack every marketing vector to get the best metrics. Using
more widely accessible and optimised language increases the chances of
being picked up by a larger cross section of the internet. It also
increase SEO by having more keywords pointing our way.
I am not a marketing expert, but words like
'Linux', 'FLOSS' might be
frightening people. 'Opensource', 'Ardour' and 'Ubuntu' (and
probably
Creative Commons) are words which lay much better in 'the market'...
I cannot begin to describe how much I disagree with "rebranding" what is
being done to make it go big. Sure "open source" is a nice term, and
"create
commons" is too, but one should stand with what it is that your *actually
doing*, and dimming it down for people getting into the scene is not going
to improve the situation in the long run. Turning them into a veteran
linux
audio guys: that's a better goal.
Restating: I disagree with the idea of
"marketing" names for what we do.
People will be draw to the comunity *because* of what we do, not because
of
*how we brand* what we do.
The guys from LMMS for example (as other projects), could mention that
Was this feed ever announced on laa ?
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
account when posting a message.
'LMMS 0.9 is out! Grab it at http://lmms.org #lmms #opensourceaudio
@opensourceaudio'
That's not a bad idea. And its being done already to some degree,
check @linuxsound,
it posts links to all LAU mails. If we done the same for the LAA list,
that
might suffice for the "Grab it here" style messages?