Hi,
So... now I feel like the careless person who flicked a lit cigarette into the vat of
kerosene and just walked away :D
I'm actually a regular user of Audacity, but I think it's more of a sound file
editor than a DAW. I love it for trimming, normalizing, fade in/out, noise reduction and
glitch repair. I don't love it for multi-tracking, cross-fading and tempo-synced
editing. If Audacity has true nondestructive, clip-based editing, I haven't found it.
To me, it's like: If you want to trim your nails, you use a fingernail clipper. If
you're doing topiary, you use other tools, up to and including a chainsaw. Audacity is
the fingernail clipper -- pretty close to ideal for the things it does well, but it
doesn't do everything well.
I don't often need multi-tracking, cross-fading or tempo-synced editing, but when I
do, that's when I want a DAW. There, it seems like it's pretty much Ardour or go
home. Contrary to some suggestions, I'm not scared of routing dialogs or submix
channels. (I particularly enjoyed the comment about being "savvy enough to operate
Supercollider" LOL :D .) It worries me a bit when David K. says "It's when
you start editing that things get awful" -- because, tight, tempo-synced editing is
exactly the time when I want clips whose edges you can edit easily and instant
cross-fades.
Ages ago, I used Digital Performer on Mac, and courses at my school now tend to use Cubase
(the latter of which... sheesh, Steinberg are really tone deaf about interface design). I
know my way around. Complexity is fine. Stability is a higher priority than a simple
interface -- given the choice between a beautiful, easy interface that crashes often and a
complex interface where things "just work" once you learn them, I'll go with
the stable, complex interface, every time.
hjh