1 Apr
2006
1 Apr
'06
10:33 p.m.
On 4/2/06, Joseph Jones <bumpycarrot(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/1/06, Paul Davis
<paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
Athlon 2000+ should cope pretty well with those 2 tasks. Until last
year my only machine was a p3 650 laptop and i did some tracks with om
and muse on it and also some stuff with ardour.
Loki
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 20:58 +0100, Joseph Jones
wrote:
But then, aren't I just comparing the same signal to itself? Or have I
misunderstood the purpose of the mono-to-stereo plugin?
--
Joe Jones
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU d-- s+:-- a-- C++ UL+ L++ E---- W++ w M t(++) 5++ tv D++ e+ h--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Hi again peeps,
So I've been having a ton of fun messing around with the various
sequencers, synths etc. available.
However, I've come against a wall, it looks kinda like this:
I want to be able to record a real instrument into Ardour (can already
do this) and then apply some LADSPA effects to it. *However*, some of
the plug-ins I'm using have two inputs, such as signal difference
plugins etc. and Ardour can't handle them. I've tried using omsynth
for this, but my poor Athlon 2000+ can't seem to handle om and Ardour
at the same time.
insert the mono-to-stereo plugin first, then the 2 input plugin after
that. ardour will do this automatically in the future.