Hi,
On Thursday 12 November 2009 09:47:59 Jorge Salgueiro wrote:
Top post is a question of accesibility to the blind.
They shouldn't have to
listen to 30 posts every time they want to contribute.
So if you don't what no linux Stevie wonder to post in this list is your
decision. But I don't agree with it.
But today's mail-clients are capable of detecting citations (by that nice >-
quotation markers in front of the line) and can fold these parts or format to
a smaller font-size. Why can't (screen-)readers detect and skip them?
I concur that is is a hassle if 30-mails are quoted. But the normal and
generally accepted behaviour is to answer below and only quote the relevant
parts[*]. And to use quotation-markers. Nothing worse then an outlook-user
answering directly inside your text without quotation-markers...
But if its better accessible for you, we can all switch to text above, full-
quote below and html :-)
Have fun,
Arnold
[*] Of course this implies that you have actually read at least the parts you
quote...