Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?

Hi Frank! I still have a little problem with the "loosing" "winning" idea. Ok: we might say we get a simple choice on track most wanted and definitely up them to the main server. But what about using simple .html file with listings and enable others to include "loosing" tracks into the lists. So everyone can VERY easily download EVERYTHING and do what they want. Because: It might just be, that someone has a great idea with a "loosing" track, that is an absolute killer-mix/master. Besides that, I still agree. Simple enough and generally effective enough. But with the.html solution, we could more easily split up the project-data, if it get's to big or to much bandwidth consuming. I think there are a lot of us with enough storage, but lacking the bandwidth. About timestamps: Why not take seconds or samples (in 44.1kHz). I know ecasound is able to go by samples (which is maximum accuracy. What about the other apps: ardour, audacity, etc...? Finally about MIDI: Why not have a midi-basetrack. Produced the most easily, easily aligned to perfect notes. And I assume everyone has a midi-sequencer and something to export midi. It's posibble with timidity, ecasound(using timidity), probably fluidsynth... It's small, simple, clean, you can read notes from it if necessary, it's standard and everyone has it. Kindest regards Julien -------- Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles) ======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ======== http://ltsb.sourceforge.net the Linux TextBased Studio guide ======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: ======= http://www.juliencoder.de