22 Aug
2005
22 Aug
'05
11:05 p.m.
Noah Roberts wrote:
On 8/22/05, tim hall
<tech(a)glastonburymusic.org.uk> wrote:
have i missed something? i've been applying patches to the 2.6.13 kernel:
is this not required anymore (makes me wonder what i actually did when
patching that kernel then ...) ?
shayne
More unsubstantiated comment, for which I
apologise:
On Monday 22 August 2005 06:54, Lee Revell wrote:
The 2.6.13 idea was probably the most helpful. Applying the rt patch
was an idea given by Revel, though not for .13...but thanks for
yelling at me about it anyway. .13 comes with the RT patch applied
already so it isn't necissary to apply any patch to this kernel....not
that I don't know how. Try the latest RT preempt patch that works with
2.6.12. Or, why not
just use a prepackaged RT patched kernel like the Demudi one?
I would guess that Noah has already tried it. There is enough traffic on the
AGNULA-users list to suggest that none of the prepackaged DeMuDi 2.6 RT
kernels are actually stable, they seem to work perfectly on some hardware and
not on others (partic. low-spec and 64bit machines).